Correct! Basically:
- SORT_STRINGS: reliable and predictable when you understand the value will
be converted to a string
- SORT_NUMERIC: same but _risky_, you should be certain you're working with
numbers
- SORT_REGULAR: the sort is unstable and will inevitably cause a bug that
no one will understand LOL

With the proposed SORT_STRICT, we will get super fast, reliable and
predictable deduplication.


On Fri, Oct 24, 2025 at 3:16 PM Morgan <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 2025-10-25 08:34, Jason Marble wrote:
> > Hello everybody!
> >
> >
> > The potential for a `SORT_NATURAL` flag also came to mind as another
> > useful addition, but I believe `SORT_STRICT` is the more critical
> > feature to discuss first.
> >
>
> I know I find array_unique generally useless due to its insistence on
> stringifying everything for comparison.
>
> ```
> $uniques = [];
> foreach($source_array as $a) {
>      if(!in_array($a, $uniques, true)) {
>          $uniques[] = $a;
>      }
> }
> ```
>
> I seem to recall part of the issue is that array_unique works by sorting
> its elements so that "equal" values are adjacent. I know this would be
> done on O(n log(n)) vs. O(n^2) grounds, but that could be addressed at
> least in part by a smarter sort criterion that sorts by type/class (in
> some arbitrary order) before sorting by value. For uncomparable types
> (i.e., instances of most classes) this would be by object ID, because we
> don't _actually_ care about ordering.
>

Reply via email to