On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 5:30 AM Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 2:13 AM Jakub Zelenka <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Ok so I guess the current status is kind on unknown... :) But as noted > by Rowan in other email, there's a mention of the PEAR Group that is the > governing body of the project although seems expired so I have really no > idea what the governance there is and if the RFC process should have any > power over that project. > > > >> > I don't think that any current core developer has access to their GH > organizattion. Or do you still have access / control to do any changes > there and make it deprecated? My main issue with this RFC is that it's > about project that we don't effectively control and I'm not sure here is > anyone who can make any such change to it. From what I see it's currently > maintained by Chuck who, I guess, also control the project. Or am I wrong? > >> > >> I do have access, I did not check the role tho'. > >> > > > > I guess this is really the crucial part here. Are you able / willing / > comfortable to potentially update the website or the tool if we approve the > RFC about deprecation and are you sure that the current maintainer is ok > with that (basically respect RFC as the governance method for PEAR)? > > To make it simple, PEAR is part of the PHP projects. There was a > separate group to do the admin work, security releases when needed, > sync with php releases to bundle it, etc. > > For the purpose of fading out pear, and, more importantly, pecl, we > can handle it here using the normal RFC flow. Most of the group > members are barely (f.e. me) or not active at all anymore. > Ok, if you say so and can make such change, I think we should put this RFC back for discussion. Kind regards Jakub
