Hi,

On Mon, Sep 8, 2025 at 4:48 PM Tim Düsterhus <t...@bastelstu.be> wrote:

> I disagree with the phrasing that the RFC passed with a “narrow margin”.
>

I just updated the wording so it now says:

> A recent RFC to deprecate the __sleep() and __wakeup() magic methods in
favor of __serialize() and __unserialize() passed (18–9), but only just met
the required 2/3 majority.

Hope it's better! :)

Kind regards,

Jakub

Reply via email to