On 22/04/2025 18:51, Levi Morrison wrote: > I don't think it blocks this RFC in any way, and could be made > frameless after the vote--I just wanted to bring up that I think > they _should_ be frameless if they get accepted (and update > array_key_first/array_key_last to be frameless too).
Hi Indeed, we have added frameless versions of functions before, without a RFC. This is not a problem because this is just like any other optimization that we PR. Note that we always need to have _both_ a normal handler and a frameless handler, so it's not about _converting_ but about adding another handler (just making sure we're on the same page :-)). Kind regards Niels
