>  Defining new syntax would encourage us to define a minimum top-level
> behaviour, such as "inside an async{} block, these things are possible,
> and these things are guaranteed to be true"

True.  This is precisely the main reason not to change the syntax. The
issue is not even about how many changes need to be made in the code, but
rather about how many agreements need to be considered.

Ed.

Reply via email to