On Sat, 16 November 2024 at 13:42 Rob Landers <rob@bottled.codes> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2024, at 10:02, Juris Evertovskis wrote: > > Is there some reason you cannot do this: > > > > https://3v4l.org/hF1vr > > > > Unless I’m missing something, you can’t patch-define a namespaced > OptionalInterface that easily. > > > > Anyway, I was not implying this is something impossible to accomplish. My > point is that it would be beneficial to have syntax for expressing “if your > app has this interface, our class implements it”. > > > > Juris > > > Yeah, I get it now (see my reply to Marco). > > Even with namespaces, it is pretty straightforward, though: > https://3v4l.org/dmXoB > > — Rob > This is a nice solution. However, interface_exists should be used for interfaces. -- Valentin >
