On 21/10/2024 21:41, mickmackusa wrote:
On Tue, 22 Oct 2024, 02:30 Valentin Udaltsov,
<udaltsov.valen...@gmail.com> wrote:
What if instead of this proposal we reimplement all of the array
functions in a different namespace and fix a lot of other problems and
inconsistencies?
Array\map(iterable $iterable, callable $mapper): array
Array\sort(iterable $iterable, int $flags = SORT_REGULAR): array
...
--
Valentin
Getting off-topic here
The whole discussion thread is "off-topic" in the context of the RFC,
but I don't consider that a problem; it's a useful discussion to have
whether the RFC sparked it or not.
Regarding the Array\map(iterable $iterable, ...) signature, if new
functions are to accept iterables instead of arrays (as they absolutely
should) then the `Array` namespace makes no sense. But at that point
we're basically just putting https://github.com/nikic/iter in core (not
that that's a bad thing).
Cheers,
Bilge
