> On Sep 2, 2024, at 18:53, Bob Weinand <bobw...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > On 3.9.2024 01:44:21, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>> On Sep 2, 2024, at 08:11, Go Kudo <zeriyo...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Internals. >>> >>> PHP currently does not provide official container images. Given that >>> DockerHub adequately maintains these and considering the maintenance costs, >>> we haven't felt the need to change the status quo. >>> >>> However, the official DockerHub images lack debug builds, which can be >>> somewhat inconvenient when trying to report bugs or reproduce issues. >>> >>> What if we were to provide debug build container images that are compatible >>> with the official DockerHub images? Fortunately, we already conduct most of >>> our development on GitHub, which has a container registry called Packages. >>> >>> This could be achieved simply by creating a single repository under the php >>> organization on GitHub. What are your thoughts on this? >>> >>> Best Regards. >>> Go Kudo >> >> Since the folks who do the DockerHub builds already have all the >> infrastructure set up to maintain the images, I think it might be easier to >> work with them to have them provide debug builds. >> >> Perhaps there’s someone from that team on this list who can speak to that? >> >> Cheers, >> Ben > > Hey Ben, > > what I'd _really_ like to see is not debug-builds, but debug symbols. > > Basically, you'd have a docker image "php:8.3" and a docker image > "php:8.3-dbgsym". The former image then just has a gnu_debuglink. The latter > has the actual symbols file included and is based on the former. > > > Thanks, > > Bob
I think the team who manages the Docker builds could also provide images with debug symbols. Since they’re already equipped for it and have the experience, why don’t we partner with them to provide these images to the community? Cheers, Ben Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
