On Wed, Aug 14, 2024 at 3:54 AM Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2024, 11:07 AM Lanre <lnearw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 4:28 PM Mike Schinkel <m...@newclarity.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 12, 2024 at 4:13 PM, <Lanre <lnearw...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> You’d have to be seriously naive to believe that “the entire industry is
>>> actively trying to move AWAY from C/C++.”
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, there is this:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://media.defense.gov/2023/Dec/06/2003352724/-1/-1/0/THE-CASE-FOR-MEMORY-SAFE-ROADMAPS-TLP-CLEAR.PDF
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>>
>>
>> The source mentions Python and Swift as "memory-safe languages," both of
>> which are implemented in C and C++. How does that work if C and C++ aren't
>> memory-safe?
>>
>
> This is the wrong analyze and approach. How many issues happen the past
> years in the core of a language vs the apps using it would be a better data.
>
> As another example, go is written in go btw.
>
> My argument about using other languages to write extensions or sapi for
> php is about ease the development and allow more people to do it.
> FrankenPHP is a very good example. There are others.
>
> Mozilla introduced Rust years ago, yet Firefox remains primarily C++, with
>> only about 3% of the codebase in Rust. By dismissing C and C++, one
>> overlooks the fact that they are crucial for powering everyday systems such
>> as elevators, automotive control units (ECUs, ADAS), medical devices,
>> consumer electronics, industrial automation, and more.
>>
> Some of my code running automates on z80 still run. Yet, newer models use
> mips cpu and C.
>
> Similarly cobol is still used, so are some c cgi applications.
>
>
>
> It IS naive to believe that “the entire industry is actively trying to
>> move AWAY from C/C++.”.
>>
>
> you are extrapolating for the sake of it. Every industry has a certain
> latency to move from one tech to another (or non tech).
>
> It does not prevent new solutions to grow and be used.
>
> also the main topic being how to handle the few cases using c++
> dependencies have been elegantly solved already.
>

This conversation is a waste of both of our times, have a wonderful day,
cheers.

Reply via email to