Christoph,
On 12-8-2024 0:18, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
On 11.08.2024 at 22:21, Juliette Reinders Folmer wrote:
Thanks Christoph! I was tempted to update the RFCs myself, but thought
it was against protocol for anyone but the RFC owner to do so ? hence my
email.
Changing an open RFC without consent of the RFC author(s) is certainly
against protocol. However, in my opinion it is perfectly fine to update
such "meta" information for closed RFCs (i.e. RFCs which have been
implemented or declined or withdrawn).
Good to know. Thanks for clarifying.
If you need links to PRs/commits, I've got them, as I've been looking
them up for the initial PHPCompatibility package updates.
Please feel free to update the necessary information yourself. Unless
you tick the "minor changes" checkbox (what you probably shouldn't do
for such updates, unless when moving RFCs on the overview page to the
correct sections), a notification is available as public RSS feed, so
everyone can follow this, and going back to an older version of the RFC
would be a matter of a couple of clicks. And frankly, I don't think an
RFC author would have an issue if somebody else catches up on what they
just might have forgotten.
I'll keep that in mind for the future (gone through most RFCs now before
I saw this reply).
Also good to know about not ticking the "minor changes" checkbox.
Thanks, Juliette
