On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, at 17:37, Ben Ramsey wrote: > > On Jun 29, 2024, at 10:16, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > > > > For clarity (since I know from experience it's helpful to RFC authors to > > have a concrete sense of votes in advance): I will be voting No on this > > RFC. As both Jordan and Saki have explained, it's a hideous hack that > > doesn't look like it would even work, much less be wise. I'd much rather > > take a second swing at Jordan's original operator overloading RFC, which I > > supported and still support. Let's do it right. > > > I agree with Larry that I would rather take another look at an overall > operator overloading RFC than to implement this in one specific extension. > > Cheers, > Ben >
Thank you Larry and Ben, I appreciate it. Out of curiosity, do you consider ArrayAccess and Stringable a hideous hack too? — Rob
