On 29/06/2024 10:31, Stephen Reay wrote:
On 29 Jun 2024, at 06:03, Bilge<bi...@scriptfusion.com> wrote:
On 28/06/2024 22:35, Niels Dossche wrote:
- Why did you choose UrlParser to be a "static" class?
Because "static class" is the hip new cool ;)
Bilge
I would argue that for 90%+ of cases, static *userland* classes are used
because of (a) autoloading and (b) the ability to use private/protected methods.
Neither of those apply to a php extension.
I agree with the others, the static parser class is weird. Either put the
static methods on the url class, or make the parser an instance with options.
No objection. I was only kidding :)
Cheers, Bilge
