On Tuesday, 18 June 2024 at 17:37, Robert Landers <landers.rob...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> Hello internals,
> 
> [...]
> 
> What are your thoughts?

As self-proclaimed leading expert on PHP type juggling.
That it is a terrible idea with no gains whatsoever.
Renaming the declare statement does not improve the situation.

> PS. Personally, I would rather unify non-strict and strict in some way
> that makes sense ... so, that route sounds nice too.

See my old meta RFC: https://github.com/Girgias/unify-typing-modes-rfc

It is a somewhat known hot take from mine that I think the strict_type declare 
statement was a mistake. [1]
Mainly because it affects barely nothing in regard to the engine.

I have written/co-authored multiple RFCs over the years to make the default 
coercion mode less whack. [2][3][4][5][6][7]
And my container/offset RFC is in the same vein [8] which lead me into a 
different rabbit hole then the one I was expecting to explore which is 
addressing PHP's weird comparison semantics. [9]

Therefore, I would rather we focus on *actually* fixing PHP's semantics, than 
arguing about changing the name of something that shouldn't really exist in the 
first place.


Best regards,

Gina P. Banyard


[1] Slide 68 of my PHP UK talk "PHP's Type System Dissected": 
https://gpb.moe/doc/slides/PHP_Type_System_Talk_PHPUK2023.pdf
[2] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/saner-numeric-strings
[3] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/implicit-float-int-deprecate
[4] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/saner-inc-dec-operators
[5] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/locale_independent_float_to_string
[6] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/exit-as-function
[7] https://wiki.php.net/rfc/deprecate-boolean-string-coercion
[8] 
https://github.com/Girgias/php-rfcs/blob/master/container-offset-behaviour.md
[9] 
https://github.com/Girgias/php-rfcs/blob/master/comparison-equality-semantics.md

Reply via email to