Hi
On 6/14/24 14:13, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
We have updated the RFC to address your feedback. Please find
additional answers below.
for some preliminary feedback: I've given the RFC another quick read and
it already reads *much* better, thank you. The two examples for the two
strategies were pretty illustrative.
- I noticed a small typo "makeInstanceLazyHost".
- The ORM example uses 'setPropertyValue', I believe it should read
'setRawPropertyValue'.
- The LazyConnection example uses 'ReflectionLazyObject', should that
read 'ReflectionLazyObjectFactory'?
I plan to give more detailed feedback at a later point, when i have the
time to think through your reply and the semantics updated RFC.
Best regards
Tim Düsterhus
PS: Thanks, I hate the example of how readonly properties can already
change in existing versions :-(