Hi

On 6/14/24 14:13, Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
We have updated the RFC to address your feedback. Please find
additional answers below.

for some preliminary feedback: I've given the RFC another quick read and it already reads *much* better, thank you. The two examples for the two strategies were pretty illustrative.

- I noticed a small typo "makeInstanceLazyHost".
- The ORM example uses 'setPropertyValue', I believe it should read 'setRawPropertyValue'. - The LazyConnection example uses 'ReflectionLazyObject', should that read 'ReflectionLazyObjectFactory'?

I plan to give more detailed feedback at a later point, when i have the time to think through your reply and the semantics updated RFC.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

PS: Thanks, I hate the example of how readonly properties can already change in existing versions :-(

Reply via email to