Hi Matteo, On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 14:08, Matteo Beccati <p...@beccati.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > Il 20/05/2024 14:03, David CARLIER ha scritto: > > I would like to know if it would be fine to deprecate pg_put_line > > <http://pg_put_line>. > > > > Reasoning is PQPutLine is part of the obsolete list of calls for COPY > > purpose > > <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/libpq-copy.html#LIBPQ-PQPUTLINE> > > since > the PostgreSQL protocol 3.0 version (supported since postgresql 7.4 > released about 20 years ago, see New client-to-server protocol regarding > COPY <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.4/release-7-4.html>). > > > > Related PR <https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/14250>. > > I have fond memories of using pg_put_line several years ago! > > It is true that it's obsolete and although they still work, they are > deprecated in libpq. > > However, I have a few remarks... > > If you're targeting the protocol 3.0 change, what is deprecated is the > pg_put_line('\\.') call that needed to be sent before calling > pg_end_copy(). > > pg_put_line() is used to send data, not just the end message. > > Hence, the UPGRADING message misrepresents the reason why pg_put_line() > is deprecated. > > In case we really decide to deprecate pg_put_line on the PHP side, so > should be pg_end_copy. > > However we don't provide a full alternative to it, because pg_copy_from > only accepts arrays, according to the documentation. As such, there is > no real alternative for "streaming" data without storing it all in memory. > Thanks for your thoughts, I ve overlooked this. > > Unless we provide it, I would vote against deprecating them. > > My opinion could change if pg_copy_from() worked with generators, but I > still think the two function still have a place for those needing > low-level access. > > > Cheers > -- > Matteo Beccati > > Development & Consulting - http://www.beccati.com/ >
