On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:25 AM tag Knife <fennic...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A few things i was interested to get the idea around. > Was it thought about for the set{} for it to return the value to set the > property to > instead implicitly setting its own field? > > eg > > ``` > public string $name { > set { > return usfirst($value); > } > } > ``` > Where the value returned in the set is what the property will be set to? > The answer to this question is best described on the RFC FAQ: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/property-hooks#why_do_set_hooks_not_return_the_value_to_set -- Marco Deleu