On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 07:10, tag Knife <fennic...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's why I suggested implementing separate lengths of the like we have for
> SHA3, so we could have BLAKE3_256 and BLAKE3_512 and maybe inbetweens.
we can look into exposing blake3's XOF (arbitrary length) capabilities
after (and if) initial blake3 support gets merged.
would probably look something like hash_final($ctx,
options:["length"=>512/8]); hash("blake3", "x", options:
["length"=>512/8]);
and deserves its own dedicated pull request.
On Mon, 22 Jan 2024 at 03:43, Gina P. Banyard <intern...@gpb.moe> wrote:
>
> Just an etiquette note, please don't top post on the mailing list. [1]
> I have no idea what this sentence is replying to, and it makes following the
> discussion difficult.
I see, thanks for the heads up.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
