Hey Larry, That's fine for the main vote, but the others are all either/or votes, not > yes/no votes, so 2/3 majority doesn't mean anything. Do you mean those are > 50/50 votes, or something else? >
Thanks for your insight again, You are right, it was a silly bug in the RFC. I've just fixed it so that the vote for the implementation itself is now a primary vote requiring 2/3 majority, while the rest of the votes are now secondary ones requiring a simple majority. Thanks, Máté
