Hi Tim. On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 12:13 PM Tim Düsterhus <t...@bastelstu.be> wrote:
> Hi > > On 9/21/23 10:26, Dmitry Stogov wrote: > > After all the Poll Request discussions (see > > https://github.com/php/php-src/pull/12079), code-reviews and internal > > discussions with core developers we decided to move this through the RFC > > process. > > > > Thanks to all participants. > > > > The RFC is open for discussion: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/jit-ir > > Thank you. I find it important to follow the formal process, even if > many folks are not able to make a meaningful decision due to the lack of > knowledge about the topic. This includes me. > > That said, I'd like to add my two cents to the "Open Issues" section: > > My understanding is that even if the new JIT might not (yet) be better > than the old one, it is not worse and it is more maintainable. The > reactions from more knowledgeable folks were pretty positive overall. > > So if the new JIT passes the existing test suite without issues, Passing test suites doesn't mean we couldn't have other problems. > I don't > see a reason why the old JIT should not be replaced right away. By > immediately removing the old JIT (ideally in a separate commit) > I'm going to agree to remove the old JIT and I like the idea of removing it in a separate commit. Thanks. Dmitry. > > Best regards > Tim Düsterhus >
