Hi Juliette, Respectfully though, in my opinion selectively leaving out impact analysis > without mentioning why they are missing in the RFC, reeks of trying to hide > information which could influence the vote. > Maybe just mentioning why the impact analysis is missing in these cases in > the RFC could take that stench away ? >
I respectfully disagree that it would affect the vote result, but I added the clarification you suggested nevertheless. :) Doing so resulted in a very nice side-effect: I noticed that the array_keys_search() function name is slightly inconsistent/misleading, since what it really does is to filter keys based on their *value* (thus the $filter_value param name). So I renamed it to array_keys_filter() as well as came up with a new suggested replacement which is compatible with at least PHP 4: using the combination of array_keys() and array_filter() retains the original behavior (example is added to the RFC). I know that it's less than ideal performance-wise, but it works anyway (and not all code is performance sensitive). Thanks, Máté
