Am 01.03.2023 um 01:13 schrieb Bob Weinand <bobw...@hotmail.com>: > In this case, while the primary concern of the RFC was rejected, I think it's > pretty clear, that there was a supermajority for something specific.
I didn't vote on this RFC but I have to disagree with you and Max here: My understanding of such a voting process is that the secondary votes are dependent on the acceptance of the first one. This means I would interpret it as 'if and only if "Should #include directives be cleaned up?" Is accepted then I'm voting yes for "Is it allowed to split a large header to reduce dependencies"'. I can't know whether the people voting here meant it that way or not, I'm just saying that taking the second vote out of context seems problematic to me. Reminds me a bit of looking at the numbers of an A/B test when the precondition "is the result significant" is false. Regards, - Chris -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
