IMO, it makes sense to fold EXPERIMENTAL and CREDITS files into the package.xml files that Hartmut added; they provide versioning and status information.
Non-BC API changes require a bump to the API major number; a new major in alpha or beta implies that the new API is subject to change until it is marked stable. --Wez. On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 10:26:25 +0300, Zeev Suraski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to get some feedback about my suggestion to move away from the > simple 'experimental' status and dividing it into two - quality rating, and > 'API subject to change' tagging. Does this make sense to anybody else? -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
