Oh, yes. Sorry for that.
Thanks for pointing out.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2022 at 3:23 PM Christoph M. Becker <cmbecke...@gmx.de>
wrote:
> On 10.09.2022 at 14:19, Eugene Sidelnyk wrote:
>
> > I have noted some strange points about `str_repeat` performance. It looks
> > like the lesser `$times` argument is, the bigger is execution time (only
> if
> > we consider big numbers).
> >
> > For example, `str_repeat('%d ', 12500);` is a lot slower than
> > `str_repeat('%d ', 1250000)`.
> >
> > First case (slow one):
> > https://3v4l.org/ZAoGi
> >
> > Second case (fast one):
> > https://3v4l.org/YIdQM
>
> It seems you have misinterpreted the results. 4.792213439941406E-5 is
> certainly much smaller than 0.013129949569702148, for instance.
>
> --
> Christoph M. Becker
>
>
