On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 at 16:17, Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2022, at 4:45 AM, Marco Pivetta wrote: > > Hey Shinji, > > > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 23:39, shinji igarashi <s...@sj-i.dev> wrote: > > > >> Hello internals, > >> > >> I've started the vote for the Constants in Traits RFC: > >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/constants_in_traits > >> > >> The vote will end on 19. July 2022. > >> > > > > I voted "NO" on this. > > > > Reasoning: > > > > * traits are pretty much unnecessary in the language. Since their > > introduction in PHP 5.4 their usage went from "let's try this out" to > "how > > do I burn this with fire?". I don't want traits to expand in scope: they > > already do enough damage with their built-in accidental complexity. > > Point of order: This is a subjective position not universally held. > Traits are certainly misusable, but so is literally everything. If used > judiciously, I have found them useful. Certainly they are better than > abstract classes in many cases. > > You may not like them, but that doesn't make them intrinsically harmful to > the language by their existence. They are not. > Certainly, but unnecessary features are bloat, and bloat is a clear negative. A feature's value must outweigh its carried maintenance and cognitive effort in order to justify its existence. As someone who worked a lot with analyzing traits (especially in reflection context), traits don't respect that requirement, **BY FAR**. Also, the idea of the RFC process here is that voters bring in their own requirements: my requirement is as subjective as yours. Greets, Marco Pivetta https://twitter.com/Ocramius https://ocramius.github.io/
