On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 7:21 PM Larry Garfield <la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote: > Are we talking about *arbitrary* user-space operator overloading? > Because a very specific, non-arbitrary, well-designed operator > overloading RFC was just rejected. >
Yup. This was pointed out to me in r11, I guess I must have missed that vote when it happened. Not even hitting 50% is as telling as it needs to be. > Personally I'd settle for a bind operator, comparison operators, > and some built-ins to use those for a new stream API bootstrap. > Yeah, streams need real love, and I hope someone with more investment in the subject takes on the work. -Sara
