On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:19 AM Jordan LeDoux <jordan.led...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 1:27 AM Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Can I expect this for other math related RFCs, or is this dogmatic about > operator overload specifically? I have no clue, and at the very least, I > would like to learn that. > It's in the name: "overload" You can certainly expect pushback from my end for any implementation thereof. As I mentioned above, your RFC is well implemented: I oppose the feature, not the implementation. Greets, Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/
