On 25/11/21 7:55 pm, Nicolas Grekas wrote: > > I voted yes because I want to see this happen but I raised a point > in https://externals.io/message/116141#116259 > <https://externals.io/message/116141#116259> and didn't get an answer: > > Despite their name, I never used natcase functions for natural > language > processing. I use them eg to sort lists of files in a directory, > to account > for numbers mainly. But that's not what I would call natural > language > processing. I'm not aware of anyone using them for that > actually. I'm > wondering if it's a good idea to postpone migrating them to an > hypothetical > future as to me, the whole reasoning of the RFC applies to them. > > > I wish the strnatcasecmp() and natcasesort() function, but also the > SORT_NATURAL flag were also covered by this RFC. > Is that possible? Would it make sense?
I'm not going to migrate those functions at this time. It's just a project scope decision. -- Tim Starling
