On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:23 PM Pierre Joye <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 4:11 PM Lynn <kja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > What is the point of this change if it's an opt-in? Projects that are > still relying on dynamic properties today and "have no time" to fix them > now, won't have time in 3 years either. Please let us have nice things > today instead of years from now :) > > If it is an opt-in (like Larry proposes f.e.), you will have them > today as well. > > Just to be clear, are you talking about opting in to having the deprecation, thus adding it to every single class in my code base, and every new class added in the future? Or are you talking about opting in to enabling dynamic properties? Because the first makes it pointless to have while the latter makes this a great RFC.
