WSL1 or WSL2? afaik they have significant performance differences, and we should only consider WSL2 as WSL1 is being deprecated afaik
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 12:31, Kamil Tekiela <tekiela...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would be great if someone on > Windows and macos could repeat this experiment > > I ran this on Windows and I got the following results: > Native Windows build: > > Without cache > real 0m31.170s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.000s > > With cache > real 0m0.694s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.000s > > Ubuntu WSL: > > Without cache > real 3m8.695s > user 0m7.009s > sys 0m18.819s > > With cache > real 0m0.707s > user 0m0.562s > sys 0m0.010s > > I am not sure how to interpret it. I doubt that any system would actually > perform 1 million operations on the same file, but I can definitely see a > noticeable difference. >
