> On Jul 16, 2021, at 6:12 AM, Bruce Weirdan <weir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 9:45 AM Eugene Sidelnyk <zsidel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Readonly properties are really useful for DDD, where everything is going to
>> be immutable. It promotes best practices. However for people to use it,
>> syntax should be concise and brief.
>
> If every property of the class is readonly it would probably be better
> to declare that with a class modifier.
>
> E.g.
>
> ```php
> readonly class Entity {
> public int $count;
> public string $data;
> }
> ```
Having a "readonly" class where the properties are read-only by default makes
sense to me, but maybe the better way to do it is with an attribute?
#[Readonly]
class Entity {
public int $count;
public string $data;
}
OTOH, that would be inconsistent with using `readonly` as a keyword for
properties.
-Mike
P.S. Maybe readonly properties should be implemented with an attribute instead
of a keyword? But then that would be opening a can of worms...
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
