Being positive is good but relying on others is not. If you really believe that your idea is worth considering, I suggest revisiting it. You can ask your self the following questions: - How is it useful? - what special thing does it provide with that the current implementation does not? - What could be the better syntax? - Does any other language have the similar feature? - If yes, what is the benefit? - Will your idea cause any BC break? - Do your proposed syntax make any confusion? - How can you make it further clear?
If you have answers to all of these questions, you can come and convince the people here. Still, I don't find your proposal till now that compelling. Rather considering the opinions shared here as an offence, take them positively and redesign your thought. Best Hamza On 6/30/21, Manuel Canga <p...@manuelcanga.dev> wrote: > > ---- En mié, 30 jun 2021 14:29:40 +0200 G. P. B. <george.bany...@gmail.com> > escribió ---- > > Ignoring the fact that this proposal is way past the cutoff date to be > able to make it into PHP 8.1 due to how the RFC process works,it seems that > this feature just came into your mind and you decided to send it onto the > list without considering its ramifications.Userland contribution and > opinions on new features (or other internal discussion) is valuable but > oughts to consider all the ramifications, good and bad, and how it affects > the language as a whole. I say this because I didn't do this when I started > contributing on this list and it made for less than stellar discussions. > > Hi, George, > > I am not an expert in developing programming languages. However, I don't > agree with that. > > When Dennis Ritchie and Brian Kernighan developed C. They didn't think in > avoid pointers because of they thought what they could be dangerous. > Surely when someone invented air planes, he didn't think of risks but > opportunities > > It was my fault. I thought that someone here would propose an idea and if > this was useful, then everyone would find the best way to put it into code. > > With last Rowan email, I understood that this purpose is useless. However, > if it had been useful, I had expected answers like: > "hey, Manuel, ``` is dangerous, why don't use other syntax like ... ? > or > "Manuel, why don't use this for heredoc ? > > In one word: Synergy. > > Why should this be done?. Because someone can read my purpose and can modify > to something better, maybe a great change to the language. > > I think so. > > Regards, > Manuel Canga > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
