On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 09:07, Pierre <pierre-...@processus.org> wrote:
> Le 14/06/2021 à 02:41, Mike Schinkel a écrit : > > A big*NO* on warnings. Full stop. > > [...] Any warning raised by the low level functions would be too > restrictive. > Hi Pierre, I'll be talking to Mike on Zoom later today (5pm UK time), which you're welcome to join. Just to confirm, this RFC is about the literal flag, and giving libraries the ability to use it via the is_literal() function (which I'm glad to hear peoples support for). It does not raise any warnings, or affect native / low-level functions. How the flag can be used in the future, like the dedicated type that someniatko and Joe have suggested, is part of a larger conversation which I'm looking forward to having in the near future. And just to put your mind at ease, I'm very much aware that systems that causes too much noise (false positives) will simply be switched off, which is no use to anyone. Craig
