On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 4:46 PM Glash Gnome <glash.gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dears,
>
> Let me briefly introduce myself. I have been a C coder for 19 years,
> including 12 years with php. And I also do Java, C++, Javascript... from
> time to time.
>
> Nikita, What would the equivalent of this code be after RFC modification?
>
> <?php
>
> class CXPLeaks
> {
> static function refCount() {
> static $i=0;
> $i++;
> }
> function refCountByClass() {
> static $i=0;
> $i++;
> }
> function __construct() {
> self::refCount();
> self::refCountByClass();
> }
> }
>
>
> Declaring a static variable in a class or in a function, in terms of
> speed/work it's the same.
> For me, this is not a bug. It's a misunderstanding
> For me, who codes in C, the current behavior is intuitive.
> For me, there is no language as agile as PHP.
>
> Best regards,
> Serge
>
Your example does not contain inheritance, so the RFC has no impact on it.
As such, I do not understand your question.
Nikita
> Le mar. 23 févr. 2021 à 15:02, Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> While looking into various issues related to static variable handling,
>> I've
>> become increasingly convinced that our handling of static variables in
>> inherited methods is outright buggy. However, it's also long-standing
>> behavior, so I've put up an RFC:
>>
>> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/static_variable_inheritance
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nikita
>>
>
