> On Feb 17, 2021, at 12:08, Rowan Tommins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17/02/2021 17:51, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>> On Feb 17, 2021, at 11:48, Chase Peeler <chasepee...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If that were to not pass, though, it seems supporting enum cases as keys >>> would be worth exploring. Fully support allowing all objects as keys though. >> >> Others, please correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe each enum case is >> already an object. > > > I think what Chase meant was that if we don't want to allow *all* objects as > keys, we could allow *a specific subset*, namely Enum cases. > > The implementation would be similar, but deliberately limiting the scope > might avoid some undesirable edge cases and side effects.
Sorry. When I read “were to not pass,” my brain missed the “not” part. :-) Cheers, Ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
