On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 12:35 PM Nicolas Grekas < nicolas.grekas+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be great to allow adding this attribute on classes. What about > allowing it right now and not bind it to any runtime side-effect? That > would allow static analyzers to do their job. Same for consts and > properties by the way. > > Also, it would be very useful to add named parameters to the attribute, > namely: "package" (the name of the package that declares the deprecation) > and "version" (the version of that package that introduced the > deprecation), next to the message. > > This is critical info when building reports of deprecations. > > You could do that now with a polyfill from userspace. If the annotation need not have an effect, then it's just any other userspace implementation. -Sara
