> On Dec 16, 2020, at 10:54, Mike Schinkel <m...@newclarity.net> wrote:
>
> If we allow "switch {...}" to represent "switch (true){...}" then the value
> switch compares will be hidden and less obvious to a developer if they are
> forgetting to consider switch's evaluation behavior. For some people this
> would increase the WTF factor.
How does `"switch (true){...}"` cause less surprise than `"switch {...}”` for
loose comparisons? IMO, seeing the boolean value `true` causes more confusion,
since it matches any truthy value but the constant value in the expression is a
bool.
Cheers,
Ben
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
