On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 2:24 PM Doug Nelson <dougnel...@silktide.com> wrote:
> Both you and Sara at different points have talked about thinking was bad > practice, but I've not read anything compelling about why it should be > considered as such. > > I'm not a full -1 on the concept (especially as match(true) has the convenience of returning a value), but it's very square peg in a round hole to me. At the end of the day though, that's a style choice and not one I have any business imposing on anyone, and certainly within the context of this diff, the actual change is trivial. It's sugar for match(true) that looks like match. /shrug I might suggest broadening the scope to include `switch` as well though. If we're going to codify match(true) as a pattern, we should at least be consistent about it. -Sara
