Hi David,
pon., 26 paź 2020 o 15:29 David Rodrigues <david.pro...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):
> > The use of > instead of => could if possible indicate the method being
> void
> > and reduce even more:
>
> I think that for void, it could just identify it and not return nothing
> automatically.
>
> function a(): int => b(); // equivalents to function a(): int { return
> b(); }
> function x(): void => y(); // equivalents to function x(): void { y(); }
>
Sure, but I've used > without adding return type ':void' intentionally what
could possibly indicate the void
if talking about reducing the return type at all for void methods.
Cheers,
Michał Marcin Brzuchalski
