This also gives me a time frame to clean up JIT code without hurry.
I plan to separate the common JIT code, and merge JIT and VM helpers.

Thanks. Dmitry.

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:55 PM Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 9:39 AM Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:49 PM Sara Golemon <poll...@php.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Next Tuesday, Sep 15th, has been marked on my calendar as the branch
> date
> >> for PHP-8.0 which would open master up for 8.1 targeted work.
> >>
> >> This would mean that bug fixes would need to include PHP-8.0 in their
> >> merge
> >> chain (meaning more work to merge 8.0 targeted fixes).
> >>
> >> Please let Gabriel and I know how you feel about this date.  I can see
> >> that
> >> master is still quite active, and I don't wish to make the work to
> >> stablize
> >> the 8.0 release any more difficult than it has to be.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I think it would be good to make this week's release beta4 rather than
> rc1
> > (without affecting the rest of the schedule). In that case we'd also push
> > back the branching and final ABI freeze two weeks.
> >
> > We're close to done with the warning to Error exception promotion task,
> > but haven't really started on reviewing and consolidating parameter names
> > yet (in preparation for named parameters). It would be good to have that
> > work mostly finalized before RC1, so we can limit the number of nominally
> > BC-breaking changes past RC1 (I expect we'll still fix some things that
> > slipped through the cracks, but at least we should prevent any mass
> > changes).
> >
> >
> Yep. This seems like a reasonable adjustment to the schedule in order to
> finalize these features.  I'll do beta4 tomorrow/thursday, and we should
> plan for RC1 branching in two weeks.  Wiki (
> https://wiki.php.net/todo/php80 )
> has been updated to reflect this.  Note that I have NOT moved the GA date
> at this time, as that would push us into Dec 10th.  Though as the date
> approaches we may decide to add RC5 back in for safety despite the
> perinavidinal timing.
>
> -Sara
>
> P.S. Yes, I made that word up. You know which one.
>

Reply via email to