On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 09:31 Nikita Popov <nikita....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > To be in line with naming conventions, I would suggest calling these > iter_any() and iter_all(), using iter_* as the prefix for our future > additions to the "functions that work on arbitrary iterables" space. > iterable_any() and iterable_all() would work as well, though are > unnecessarily verbose. > > Regards, > Nikita > Oof, does it really have to be butchered this way? Or are you trolling? 😬 Did the namespaces ship sail forever? Can we just have those instead, please? >
