> Am 16.08.2020 um 01:08 schrieb Paul M. Jones <pmjo...@pmjones.io>: > > HI all, > > >> On Aug 15, 2020, at 18:00, Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote: >> >> Additionally, Derick and I are waiting for word from Sara and Gabriel at >> the moment, but we suggested to close and reset the vote to wait until the >> discussion period is over on Tuesday to accommodate the criticism of us >> prematurely starting the vote (by accident, not intentionally). > > /me furrows brow > > If I understand correctly, that means the currently-running vote overlaps > with the discussion period? If so, that sounds (again) highly irregular. > > The proper thing to do here is a full reset: restart the 2-week discussion > period at the moment the current vote is declared null and void, then start a > new vote (if the RFC is not withdrawn) after thatn 2-week period. > > Basically, the sooner the current vote is explicitly declared null and avoid, > the sooner the properly-conducted 2-week discussion period can begin.
The Voring RFC clearly states 2 weeks from the announcement on this list. If we consider the current vote an instance of human error, then i dont see how restarting the discussion helps. I spent the whole day incorporating every argument and discussion thread into the new RFC Version to be, so that voters will be fully informed by the RFC once the vote re-starts on Tuesday. > > -- > Paul M. Jones > pmjo...@pmjones.io > http://paul-m-jones.com > > Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP > https://leanpub.com/mlaphp > > Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP > https://leanpub.com/sn1php > > >
