On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:52 PM guilhermebla...@gmail.com < guilhermebla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > One question I'd like answered is that, like me, a few people have > voted NO on the question to re-vote the syntax. > If that is true, shouldn't their first primary choice be implied to be > <<>> instead of anything else? I see 7 votes for no, but I'm the only > one that still kept the first voting choice as <<>>. > At this point voting NO on the primary vote means that you are either: 1. are not ok with revolting this late in the release cycle 2. want to keep @@, because this is the current syntax (not <<>>) > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:40 AM Rowan Tommins <rowan.coll...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 14:08, Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> > wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:28 AM Peter Bowyer < > phpmailingli...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> I have voted no because I asked a question about the ending delimiter > and > > >> why () didn't count. Another person asked a similar question and > neither > > >> of > > >> us got a reply. > > >> > > > > > > () does not count as ending symbol, because it is not required, as such > > > its not an ending symbol. > > > > > > > > > The question asked was that _if the parentheses were made mandatory_, > would > > this provide the same benefits ascribed to the other syntaxes? > > > > To avoid repeating myself, here are the previous posts where I elaborated > > on this question: > > > > * https://externals.io/message/111312#111342 > > * https://externals.io/message/111312#111354 > > > > > > Regards, > > -- > > Rowan Tommins > > [IMSoP] > > > > -- > Guilherme Blanco > SVP Technology at Statflo Inc. > Mobile: +1 647 232 5599 > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > >
