On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 7:22 PM tyson andre <tysonandre...@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> The match expression can be thought of as a much more concise/readable
> equivalent to chained ternary operators.
> I'm proposing allowing matches in constant expressions when all parts of
> the match are constant expressions.
>
>
That seems pretty reasonable.


> 1. Should this target 8.0 or 8.1? I'm leaning towards 8.1 since the beta
> is already out.
>

8.1, the 8.0 ship has sailed.


> 2. Are there objections to doing this?
>

Not from me, though I don't think I'd use it personally.


> 3. Should/shouldn't php enforce that the default arm exists for match *in
> constant expressions*
>    (constant expressions can already throw errors when evaluated for
> various reasons, but UnhandledMatchError is new)
>

Such a construct would be compile-time evaluated, so not having a match
should result in a compile error.  Having a default should be considered
best-practice (to avoid surprise compile failures), but I don't think it
needs to be a hard-requirement.

-Sara

Reply via email to