On Tue, 4 Aug 2020, Sara Golemon wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 9:03 AM Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote: > > > It provides a small BC break where code written as @[$foo, $bar] = > > baz(); or $foo = @["bar" => $baz]; will not compile on PHP 8 > > anymore, but that can be easily fixed by writing it with a space > > between @ and [. > > > If those are the potential breaks we're choosing between, I would > favor #[...] as it provides strong forward-compatibility to drive > adoption and use at the cost of a parse error that's easily fixed > (even programmatically with a very simple script). @[...] provides no > forward compat with a roughly equal chance of easily fixed syntax > break. > > Given that, the choice seems obvious to me. Change my mind?
I pretty much agree, but @[ … ] is there as a compromise as it does show some fmailiarity with the already existing @ in doc blocks. cheers, Derick -- PHP 7.4 Release Manager Host of PHP Internals News: https://phpinternals.news Like Xdebug? Consider supporting me: https://xdebug.org/support https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io twitter: @derickr and @xdebug
-- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
