On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 8:51 PM Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > Only the trigger mode 4 (attributes) is actually using @@Jit("tracing")
> and
> > "function". This trigger mode feels like micro-management for developers
> > and since it has virtually no spotlight in discussions and blog posts
> about
> > the JIT at the moment, we don't know if it brings benefits.
>
> I think turning JIT off is a valid use case, the rest looks much more
> iffy. I am not sure we want to let people tell the engine to JIT certain
> functions - are there a lot of cases where the engine wouldn't do it but
> it's actually the right thing to do?
>
In that case maybe we should rename the attribute to @@DisableJit ? This
would not clutter the global namespace with a "jit" class.
>
> Don't see any use for "opcache.jit=attributes".
>
> --
> Stas Malyshev
> smalys...@gmail.com
>
