On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 7:50 AM Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote:
> I think it has become clear that we need to revisit this syntax question > again, including the elephpant in the room of delaying this feature to 8.1. > > The reason is not only Joe's desire to revote on #[], <snipped> > > No, I *do not* want to revote. This RFC simply takes a formal approach to approve the syntax that came in 2nd based on concerns raised with the @@ syntax. Now that it seems the technical concerns around @@ have been resolved by another pending, passing, RFC, I'm still here wanting us to talk about the impact of @@ on static analysis tools. Apparently, internals doesn't care about these projects. I care and I'm trying to help. I'm not trying to revote until I get the vote I want. I'm just a dude that had some free time while on vacation when he saw a chance to contribute. I see two possible outcomes: Release Managers collectively should decide what we do to move forward. Either accept @@, we'll decline this RFC and we can move on to the next nearest bikeshed. OR If Release Managers don't want to, or can't collectively make a decision then this RFC should go to a vote and we'll see what 2/3s of the group want. I'm fine with either outcome. https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax_change -- - Joe Ferguson JoeFerguson.me osmihelp.org
