> On Jul 28, 2020, at 10:13, Côme Chilliet <come.chill...@fusiondirectory.org> > wrote: > > Le Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:46:38 -0500, > Joe Ferguson <j...@joeferguson.me> a écrit : > >> Hello Internals, >> >> I've been working with Derick Rethans and others (thanks all!) on a Shorter >> Attribute Syntax Change RFC which outlines reasons why the "#[]" syntax >> would be preferred over the currently agreed upon "@@" syntax for Shorter >> Attribute Syntax. >> >> An important part of the research that went into this proposal demonstrates >> how "@@" will make handling attributes more difficult for PHP_CodeSniffer >> (and similar tools) and shows how the alternative "#[]" syntax is more >> friendly for these tools. >> >> You can find the RFC >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax_change and I'm happy to >> answer any questions as best I can. >> > > The text uses « instead of <<, it’s confusing. > > It should be made clearer what #[ ] has over << >>, which does not cause any > BC > break. > > Côme
I don’t know that it’s valuable to spend time discussing advantages over `<< >>`. Isn’t it clear from the previous RFC[^1] that `@@` and `#[ ]` both won out over `<< >>`? Cheers, Ben [^1]: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shorter_attribute_syntax
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
