On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Miguel Rosales wrote: > Larry Garfield wrote on 07/07/2020 16:46: > > This has reached the 2 week mark, but there's not been much discussion. > > Anyone else want to weigh in? > > > > I guess I'm missing something obvious here, but the RFC says: > > > 5. Component or sub-component namespaces MUST use CamelCase naming > conventions. > > But then in the examples you've got e.g. \PHP\DOM\ or \PHP\SPL\... isn't > that incorrect? > > And slightly related, is there any reason to use \PHP instead of \Php? > > Sorry if this has been discussed before, I haven't seen it. > > Cheers, > Miguel
Mm, mainly because I added the CamelCase clause late and didn't think about abbreviations. Whether it should be PHP/XML/DOM or Php/Xml/Dom has been an ongoing debate for at least since PHP 5.0. I have no preference strong enough to die on that hill, though, so whatever voters are willing to go for I'm good with. Anyone care enough to offer a bikeshed color? --Larry Garfield -- PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php
