Hey Pedro, On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 5:59 PM Pedro Magalhães <m...@pmmaga.net> wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:07 AM Pedro Magalhães <m...@pmmaga.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:46 PM Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Considering that, as far as I know, only the constructor remains >>> "special". >>> >> >> Leaving the special case only for constructors instead of all magic >> methods sounds better to me. Right now, that sounds like a winning >> compromise for the RFC. It is still an exception to a rule, but one that >> can be better justified. >> >> Thanks, >> Pedro >> > > I have updated both the implementation and the RFC to reflect this > exception for constructors. If no further discussion comes up, I'll open > the vote in a few days. > > Regards, > Pedro > Looking good! Just some formatting issues around __construct (rendered as _construct), but otherwise I would vote +1 for this! Marco Pivetta http://twitter.com/Ocramius http://ocramius.github.com/
