On Mon, 20 Apr 2020 at 22:36, Marco Pivetta <ocram...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Andrea, > > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020, 23:25 Andrea Faulds <a...@ajf.me> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Benjamin Eberlei wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have opened the vote on the Attributes v2 RFC. The voting will be > open > > > until two weeks from now, May 4th 2020, noon UTC. > > > > > > RFC: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/attributes_v2 I know that I'm "too late" to be making suggestions, but I would like to see a new "@@" operator over the proposed <<...>> or @:. While it is possible (!!) that some code is already using a double @-operator in a way that would conflict, I'd posit that it is a reasonable BC break in return for a subjectively nicer (for want of a better word) attribute operator. Nikita and Sara shared similar grumblings in unofficial channels [1] [2]. However, there is something to be said for just deciding on *anything* and rolling forward with it. [1] https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/11/conversation/at-at-01 and https://chat.stackoverflow.com/rooms/11/conversation/at-at-02 [2] https://www.reddit.com/r/PHP/comments/g4psl5/rfc_attributes_vote_is_open_now/fnz97fk/ > > > > > > > Thank you everyone for taking part in the detailed discussion. > > > > > > greetings > > > Benjamin > > > > > > > Thanks for putting this to a vote. I remember I had some comments about > > autoloading behaviour and you changed the behaviour in the RFC, but I > > didn't get around to reading it again. I am concerned though that it > > doesn't seem to say anymore when autoloading happens, if at all? Can > > that be clarified? > > > > Thanks, > > Andrea > > > > From my review of the tests, autoloading occurs when an object is being > requested (via `newInstance()` call on a reflection attribute). > > Until then, the same semantics as the `::class` pseudo-constant apply. > > > >
